Rethinking Aid in SSA’s Development Ecosystem: Weaponization, Dependency, and the Path to Regional Self-Reliance

Over the past six decades, Sub-Saharan Africa (SSA) has received hundreds of billions of dollars in foreign aid. Yet, the continent’s development story is often framed by disappointment and unrealized promises. Classic narratives framed assistance as the key to closing infrastructure gaps, expanding social services, and catalyzing agricultural transformation. Today, a stark reality persists: extreme poverty, widespread instability, fractured governance, and stagnant social indicators still define many states. For many observers and policymakers, it is time to rethink Africa’s relationship with aid in a radical way.

This Global-Pulse Africa edition takes a critical lens to the weaponization of aid, how it shapes not only economies but also entire political and social systems. Drawing on contemporary data, sectoral analysis, and the lessons of history, this dispatch advances a new argument: Only regionally coordinated, African-owned solutions can break cycles of dependency and deliver sustainable development for the continent.

Foreign aid is never neutral. It comes with strings, not just fiscal or governance reforms, but sometimes with outright veto power over policy, spending, and political alignments. Major African institutions, from the African Union (AU) to regional bodies such as ECOWAS and IGAD, rely on external partners for over half of their budgets in some years. Such reliance skews priorities, constrains agenda-setting autonomy, and limits the capacity to act decisively in Africa's interests.

Table 1: Donor Dependency in African Institutions (2023 - 2025)

Most African Development institutions get more than 50% of their funding outside the continent

"Donor priorities continue to shape Africa’s continental and regional strategies. Even infrastructure, agriculture, security, and research programs are steered by donor cycles, undermining the promise of true “African-driven transformation.”

The AU and Africa’s Regional Economic Communities (RECs) remain structurally unable to deliver on their bold mandates because foreign donor preferences, financing, and project cycles significantly influence their core operations and policy agendas. The EU, the World Bank, major bilateral donors, and multilateral agencies collectively provide 60–80% of operational funds to organizations such as the AU, SADC, ECOWAS, and IGAD. This donor dominance leads to fragmented, project-based funding, often earmarked for specific sectors or external priorities, rather than for Africa’s own integration and transformation. Administrative burdens rise as RECs are forced to follow different (often conflicting) planning, budgeting, and reporting systems for each donor, making it virtually impossible to formulate and deliver a coherent, continent-wide vision.

The knock-on effect is that Africa’s supposed decision-making bodies are perpetually adjusting, delaying, or diluting initiatives to accommodate external timelines and requirements. Integration projects such as transport corridors, digital payment systems, or cross-border trade harmonization are often stalled by unpredictable funding and overlapping donor mandates. Member states, meanwhile, honor only partial financial commitments, increasing “legitimacy deficits” and encouraging selective participation in regional rulings. The COVID-19 pandemic and global commodity shocks highlighted the consequences: without internally aligned economic policies, Africa remained fragmented, struggling to jointly procure vaccines or coordinate trade responses, while the continent’s share of global trade stagnated at under 3% (WTO, 2023).

Aid inflows intended for development have often entrenched dependency, crowding out local initiative and discouraging market-led resource mobilization. In 2018 alone, fourteen SSA countries received net aid volumes higher than 50% of their entire public budgets. Yet, the majority remain at the bottom of the global Human Development Index (HDI) and infrastructure indices.

Table 2: Aid Dependency and Development Metrics (14 Most Aid-Dependent SSA Countries)

High Aid dependency leads to a Low Human Development Index, which in turn contributes to poverty in SSA.

When aid overshadows local fiscal mobilization, African governments remain accountable not to their citizens but to foreign governments and multilateral institutions, thereby blunting the potential for pan-African unity and self-reliance.

Aid conditionalities and project-by-project thinking mean that donor interests regularly override national and continental priorities, even those outlined in Agenda 2063. OECD development cooperation frameworks for Africa nominally reference the continental agenda, but in practice, their mechanisms seldom prioritize local institutional strengthening or pan-African ownership. Africa’s democratic transitions often shift focus to fiscal survival, turning aid into a short-term lifeline but not a driver for deep institutional reform. As a result, new governments frequently reprioritize donor engagement and budget management over long-term system building.

 Africa’s opportunity to escape recurrent cycles of external dependency is more tangible than ever, if bold new financial strategies and full continental ownership match regional integration. Data show that the continent loses over $50 billion annually to tax evasion and profit shifting by multinationals, amounting to more than 4% of African GDP, while donor funds often represent less than half of the total lost to illicit financial flows and weak contracts. Despite receiving $100–168 billion a year in remittances, only a fraction is channeled into infrastructure or productive enterprises due to fragmented financial systems and limited investment opportunities on the continent.

The African Continental Free Trade Area (AfCFTA), when fully implemented, is projected to boost intra-African trade by as much as 52% and raise GDP by $35 billion, demonstrating the power of regional policy alignment and integrated markets. Likewise, the rise of diaspora bonds and local climate finance initiatives, such as Ethiopia’s GERD project, demonstrates that African-led solutions can successfully mobilize billions outside the donor framework if policies and institutions are resilient, transparent, and designed for a continental scale. By renegotiating natural resource contracts, advancing a pan-African tax code, and developing internal investment platforms, Africa can redirect capital inflows and control its own transformative agenda.

Table 3: Regional and Homegrown Solutions Accelerating Africa’s Transformation

African-led solutions will form the basis for macroeconomic growth for SSA

As Africa continues to advocate for its long-term transformation through Agenda 2063, a critical disconnect remains: much of the OECD’s development cooperation for Africa only partially aligns with this vision, often prioritizing donor-driven goals or short-term fiscal stabilization for many African governments especially those following democratic transitions, immediate fiscal survival usually takes precedence over institutional investment, resulting in a policy environment where aid dependence shapes national priorities and undermines deeper, structural reforms.

This cyclical vulnerability means that instead of building robust governance systems to drive the transformative change envisaged in Agenda 2063, both external partners and new African administrations risk defaulting to “project-by-project” survival strategies. Until both partners make institutional strengthening, policy alignment, and actual continental ownership central to development cooperation, Africa’s blueprint for “the Africa we want” will remain only partially realized.

About an Author

Franco Bonghan, is a Co-Chair of the African and Caribbean Energy Network (ACEN) and Founder of Bright Light Projects (BLP), a nonprofit organization dedicated to sustainable development, energy access, and social impact.

 References:

1. African Union. “Sustainable Financing.” AU Commission, 2 Nov. 2018, https://au.int/en/aureforms/financing
2. “About 70% of the African Union's $650m Budget is Funded Externally.” LinkedIn, 5 June 2025, https://www.linkedin.com/posts/larrymadowo_about-70-of-the-african-unions-650m-budget-activity-7336647786035142656-cizE
3. ECDPM. “Financing the African Union: On Mindsets and Money.” ECDPM, 2023, https://ecdpm.org/download_file/256/1215 (PDF)
4. SADC Secretariat. “Achievements Booklet: SADC Major Achievements and Challenges.” SADC, Dec. 2021, https://www.sadc.int/sites/default/files/2021-12/Achievements_booklet.pdf (PDF)
5. “Reduce Dependence on Donor Funding – SADC Urged.” SADC, 23 July 2014, https://www.sadc.int/latest-news/reduce-dependence-donor-funding-sadc-urged
6. IMF. “Central African Economic and Monetary Community (CEMAC).” Country Report, 2025, https://www.imf.org/-/media/Files/Publications/CR/2025/English/1caeea2025002-source-pdf.ashx (PDF)
7. World Bank. “Improving Management and Financing of Roads in Central African States.” World Bank, 29 Sept. 1999, https://www.ssatp.org/publication/improving-management-and-financing-roads-central-african-states-review-road-sector
8. UNU-CRIS. “Mapping and Problematising External Funding to the African Union and Regional Economic Communities.” UNU-CRIS, 2020, https://gup.ub.gu.se/file/208014 (PDF)
9. Center for Global Development. “The African Development Fund Replenishment and the Resource Curse.” CGDev, 23 Apr. 2025, https://www.cgdev.org/publication/african-development-fund-replenishment-and-resource-curse-2025
10. AUDA-NEPAD. “Technical White Paper: Unlocking Sustainable Infrastructure Financing in Africa.” 31 Jan. 2004, https://www.nepad.org/publication/technical-white-paper-missing-connection-unlocking-sustainable-infrastructure (PDF)
11. Mo Ibrahim Foundation. “Demystifying Africa's Dependence on Foreign Aid.” Mo Ibrahim Foundation, 6 Aug. 2025, https://mo.ibrahim.foundation/news/2025/demystifying-africas-dependence-foreign-aid
12. United Nations Economic Commission for Africa. “Africa's Pulse.” World Bank, 15 Apr. 2025, https://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/099707204242523579/pdf/IDU-5b57f200-2b97-41df-bd50-0cfaf14bea4f.pdf (PDF)
13. ISS Africa. “Rethinking Remittances: The Overlooked Billions Sustaining African Households.” ISS Africa, 18 Aug. 2025, https://futures.issafrica.org/blog/2025/Rethinking-remittances-the-overlooked-billions-sustaining-African-households
14. “Remittances as Development Finance: Africa’s Overlooked Billions.” ISS Africa, 25 Aug. 2025, https://issafrica.org/iss-today/remittances-as-development-finance-africa-s-overlooked-billions
15. Migration Money & UNCDF. “Payment Infrastructure Assessment – DRC, April 2025.” Migrant Money, 2025, https://migrantmoney.uncdf.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/05/Payment-Infrastructure-Assessment-DRC-April2025.pdf (PDF)
16. African Leadership Magazine. “Diaspora Bonds: Africa’s New Economic Lifeline.” African Leadership Magazine, 24 Mar. 2025, https://www.africanleadershipmagazine.co.uk/diaspora-bonds-africas-new-economic-lifeline/
17. Brookings Institution. “Diaspora Bonds: An Innovative Source of Financing?” Brookings, 14 Dec. 2022, https://www.brookings.edu/articles/diaspora-bonds-an-innovative-source-of-financing/
18. CODAfrica. “Reform of the Global Tax Regime: An African Perspective.” CODAfrica, 2023, https://codafrica.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/09/presentation-on-tax-new.pdf (PDF)
19. ATAF. “The Global South Needs a Just Alternative to the OECD Deal.” Global Tax Justice, 27 Jan. 2025, https://globaltaxjustice.org/news/the-global-south-needs-a-just-alternative-to-the-oecd-deal-lessons-from-south-africa/
20. UNDP. “Financing Ethiopia’s Green Transition.” UNDP, Jan. 2025, https://www.undp.org/sites/g/files/zskgke326/files/2025-01/undp-working_paper_series-financing_ethiopias_green_transition_finalweb_0.pdf (PDF)
21. Climate Policy Initiative. “Landscape of Climate Finance in Ethiopia.” CPI, Nov. 2022, https://www.climatepolicyinitiative.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/11/Landscape-of-Climate-Finance-in-Ethiopia.pdf (PDF)
22. Resource Governance. “Ready, Set, Renegotiate! Senegal Reassesses Its Mining and Petroleum Contracts.” Resource Governance, 28 Aug. 2024, https://resourcegovernance.org/articles/ready-set-renegotiate-senegal-reassesses-its-mining-and-petroleum-contracts
23. African Governance Report. “Agendas 2063 & 2030: Is Africa on Track?” Mo Ibrahim Foundation, 2020, https://mo.ibrahim.foundation/sites/default/files/2020-02/African_Governance_Report_2019.pdf (PDF)
24. World Economic Forum. “How a Single Market Would Transform Africa's Economy.” World Economic Forum, 2 June 2025, https://www.weforum.org/stories/2018/02/how-a-single-market-will-transform-africa-s-economy/